Monday, May 18, 2009
Penalty Unfair
The current pressure on MUNI to "get tough" on fare evaders creates an even bigger sinkhole for public
funds - and more tension on trains.
This week Supervisor Bevan Dufty became the latest in the long line of public officials around the country to address the issue of MUNI fare evasion, an offense whose level of outrage seems to correlate to a city's economic health. Dufty "is pushing to increase evasion citations by 50 percent, which would bring the fine for first-time offenders up to $75 from the current $50. Dufty is also suggesting fines of up to $250 and $500 for second-time and third-time violators, respectively."
MUNI fares are in the news this month as the City's economic woes bring pressure to bear on any municipal revenue stream, and the MUNI fare box has always been the subject of political tug-of-war betweentransit advocates who endorse cheap, plentiful transit as an incentive for citizens to stop using their polluting and sprawl-inducing cars so much, and fiscal conservatives who tend to indict transit as an exemplar of everything that is wrong about social democracy - an overpaid driver and an underpaid fare box leading the way inside a mobile aquarium of the working poor and ungovernable urban youth covered in magic marker ink, crack pipes, spilled coffee and lickspittle. The end result is that nobody seems to want to look at the issue in terms of how to effectively ameliorate the problem.
Concerns about fare evasion are rising in all major cities. That's because we're in a recession, and cities need money. The fact that fare evasion rises when everyone is under economic pressure makes it an even more convenient bugaboo that allows transit agencies to vent popular pressure while increasing fares. Enforcement schemes against fare evasion are indeed more often than not more expensive than the lost fare income itself, and in a culture where the public expectation of transit fares are still based upon the outdated notion that transit is primarily for the poor to lower middle class, you'll never get away politically with bringing fares up to the level where they actually pay for service.
The stu
pidity of fare evasion enforcement becomes even clearer when you combine the subsidy-vectored pressures of cities like
San Francisco (where the rule against back-door boarding is broken literally hundreds of thousands of times per day out of common sense) with
the individualistic cultures of Left Coast cities generally. Such schemes become characterized by the public as the urban equivalent of the old Southern
"Speed Trap" as any hope to legitimize the policy goes out the window. End result: more fare evasion.
So whatever happened to Penalty Fares? Is it really more expensive to just make scofflaws pay their fare on the spot rather than process all those citations?
Now there's an idea.
Discuss on The Wall: San Francisco Politics, Policy, and Government
